Transradial Intervention

Broadcast

Coronary Physiology and DCBs: The Modern Approach for CTO-PCI

Tomas Kovarnik , Mohamed Ayoub, Giuseppe Di Gioia, et al

Watch time: 1h 1m 35s

Broadcast

TRI-HERO: Discover the award winning protocols

James Nolan, Ivo Bernat, Alison Dahlmann, et al

Broadcast

Transforming STEMI Care: Bridging Interventional and HF Cardiology

Sandeep Nathan, Dan Burkhoff, Jerry D Estep, et al

Watch time: 1h 31s

Broadcast

Abbott Core 2022

James Spratt, Adrian P Banning, Jonathan Hill, et al

Broadcast

Transforming STEMI Care: Bridging Interventional and HF Cardiology

Sandeep Nathan, Dan Burkhoff, Jerry D Estep, et al

Watch time: 1h 31s

Broadcast

Complexities in Left Main Diseases

José M de la Torre Hernández, Tamara García Camarero, Aritz Gil Ongay, et al

Watch time: 1h 11m 28s

Broadcast

Precision Diagnostics in LM Bifurcation Disease

José M de la Torre Hernández, Tamara García Camarero, Andrew SP Sharp, et al

Watch time: 1h 39m 31s

About

 

Transradial artery access (TRA) for diagnostic CA or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with lower bleeding and vascular complications than transfemoral artery access (TFA). The European Society of Cardiology guidelines and American Heart Association support a TRA first strategy and evidence also supports an improvement in healthcare quality, and reduced cost. While TFA predominates peripheral interventions, increases in dedicated equipment and the technical expertise may result in TRA as a preferred access in this patient group as well.

Articles

APSC Consensus Recommendations for MitraClip in MR

Published:

01 June 2021

Citation:

European Cardiology Review 2021;16:e25.

Updates from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative

Published:

23 March 2021

Citation:

Interventional Cardiology Review 2021;16(Suppl 2):11–2.

Transradial Coronary Artery Procedures: Tips for Success

Citation:

Interventional Cardiology Review 2017;12(1):18–24

Transradial Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Citation:

Interventional Cardiology Review 2016;11 (2):88–92