Systemic Inflammation and Clinical Vascular Responses in Coronary Surgery

Login or register to view PDF.
Citation
Asia Pacific Cardiology - Volume 1 Issue 1;2007:1(1):65-67

Pages

Systemic inflammation is seen in all surgery and trauma; however, it is more profound in cardiac surgery that uses cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The contact of blood components with non-biological surfaces such as the pump tubing, oxygenator membranes and altered propulsion by the roller pumps is a significant factor in amplifying the inflammatory effects of CPB. While CPB is currently unavoidable in valve replacement surgery, there are choices between conventional surgery using CPB and off-pump (OP) techniques in coronary surgery, especially if reducing the extent of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is an objective.
As coronary surgery accounts for over 70% of cardiac surgery, the potential for minimising the deleterious effects of the SIRS has extensive implications as it would benefit large numbers of patients. However, surgical and pharmacological strategies to prevent or minimise SIRS may have untoward consequences with respect to the completeness of revascularisation, graft patency and the degree and duration of invasive monitoring.

Evidence of Systemic Inflammation

Massive release of inflammatory markers into the circulation occurs. These include activated complement components C3a and C5a, interleukins (IL-6, IL-8 and IL-1β) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α – all cytokines that promote neutrophil and monocyte mobilisation in response and directed to the sites of inflammation and perceived vascular injury. In addition, many other vasoactive mediators are released, including endothelin, histamine, prostacyclin and bradykinin.1,2 Almost invariably the concentrations of these cytokines increase by between 10- and 100-fold over baseline, with peak-level increases during CPB occurring four to 12 hours after completion of CPB before falling back to normal by between 48 and 72 hours.2
In parallel, there is organ dysfunction of varying degrees, particularly in the lungs, kidneys and central nervous and gastrointestinal systems. These parallel changes are in part attributed to the intense affects of the newly released vasoactive molecules, but may also be due to the non-pulsatile flow associated with CPB, lower mean pressures and microemboli.1–3 Inflammatory lung injury appears to be due to the effects of activated leukocytes on the pulmonary capillaries resulting in increased vascular permeability, extravascular water content and shunting. In the brain, CPB is associated with an increase in extracellular fluid, as noted on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).4

Pages

References
  1. Menasché P, The systemic factor: the comparative roles of cardiopulmonary bypass and off-pump surgery in the genesis of patient injury during and following cardiac surgery, Ann Thorac Surg, 2001;72:S2260–66.
  2. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, et al., Inflammatory response after coronary revascularisation with or without cardiopulmonary bypass, Ann Thorac Surg, 2000;69:1198–1204.
  3. Brooker RF, Brown WR, Moody DM, et al., Cardiotomy Suction, a major source of Brain lipid emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass, Ann Thorac Surg, 1998;65:1651.
  4. Asimakopoulos G, Systemic inflammation and cardiac surgery: an update, Perfusion, 2001;16:353–60.
  5. Morris DC, Clements SD Jr, Bailey JM, Management of the patient after cardiac surgery, In: Fuster V, Alexander RW, O’Rourke RA, et al. (eds), The Heart, 2004;59:1509–16.
  6. Tatoulis J, Rice S, Davis P, et al., Patterns of post-operative systemic vascular resistance in a randomised trial of conventional on-pump versus off-pump coronary bypass graft surgery, Ann Thor Surg, 2006;82:1436–45.
  7. Wan IYP, Arifi AA, Wan S, et al., Beating heart revascularisation with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: Evaluation of inflammatory response in a prospective randomised study, J Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg, 2004;127: 1624–31.
  8. Velissaris T, Tang ATM, Murray M, et al., A prospective randomised study to evaluate stress response during beating-heart and conventional coronary revascularisation, Ann Thorac Surg, 2004;78:506–12.
  9. Prondzinsky R, Knupfer A, Loppnow H, et al., Surgical trauma affects the proinflammatory status after cardiac surgery to a higher degree than cardiopulmonary bypass, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005;129:760–66.
  10. Brasil LA, Walter J, Gomes WJ, Inflammatory response after myocardial revascularisation with or without cardiopulmonary bypass, Ann Thorac Surg, 1998;66:56–9.
  11. Strüber M, Cremer JT, Gohrbandt B, et al., Human cytokine responses to coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass, Ann Thorac Surg, 1999;68:1330–35.
  12. Yang Z, Zingarelli B, Szabo C, Crucial role of endogenous interleukin-10 production in myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury, Circulation, 2000;101:1019–26.
  13. Ascione R, Caputo M, Angelini GD, Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: not a flash in the pan, Ann Thorac Surg, 2003;75:306–13.
  14. Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, et al., Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extracorporeal circulation, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002;22:527–33.
  15. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EWL, et al., Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: Results from a randomised study, Circulation, 2001;104:1761–6.
  16. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al., Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and one-year graft patency, cost and quality-of-life outcomes, JAMA, 2004;291:1841–9.
  17. Gaudino M, Glieca F, Alessandrini F, et al., High-risk coronary artery bypass patient: incidence, surgical strategies and results, Ann Thorac Surg, 2004;77:574–80.
  18. Straka Z, Widimsky P, Jirasek K, et al., Off-pump versus onpump coronary surgery: final results from a prospective randomised study Prague-4, Ann Thorac Surg, 2004;77:789–93.
  19. Chaney MA, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Methylprednisolone does not benefit patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery and early tracheal extubation, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2001;121:561.
  20. Hill GE, Bohorecki R, Alonso A, et al., Aprotinin reduces interleukin-8 production and lung neutrophil accumulation after cardiopulmonary bypass, Anesth Analg, 1996;83:696.
  21. Wagner FM, Wever AG, Ploetze K, et al., Do vitamins C and E attenuate the effects of reactive oxygen species during pulmonary reperfusion and thereby prevent injury?, Ann Thorac Surg, 2002;74:811.