ST Segment Elevation During Adenosine Pharmacological Stress Testing in a Patient with Coronary Artery Disease

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare:

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit to start a request.

For author reprints, please email
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating
Copyright Statement:

The copyright in this work belongs to Radcliffe Medical Media. Only articles clearly marked with the CC BY-NC logo are published with the Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. The CC BY-NC option was not available for Radcliffe journals before 1 January 2019. Articles marked ‘Open Access’ but not marked ‘CC BY-NC’ are made freely accessible at the time of publication but are subject to standard copyright law regarding reproduction and distribution. Permission is required for reuse of this content.

Case history: a 76-year-old African-American female presented to a community hospital with complaints of chest pain. Her medical history was significant for hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), hyperlipidemia, and bipolar disorder. On arrival at the emergency department, electrocardiogram showed acute inferior wall myocardial infarction (MI). The patient received thrombolytic therapy with tenecteplase (TNKase™) with successful reperfusion. On arrival at our hospital, the patient denied any chest pain and her electrocardiogram showed sinus bradycardia with small Q-waves in the inferior leads II, III, and AVF (see Figure 1). She was treated with aspirin, heparin, lisinopril, simvastatin, and clopidogrel. Beta-blocker was not started as the patient was having bradycardia. The patient was scheduled to undergo myocardial perfusion scan 48 hours following her uncomplicated inferior wall MI.

At rest, the patient received 12.0mCi of technetium 99m-sestamibi. Seventy-five minutes later, rest myocardial perfusion images were obtained by non-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Then she received adenosine infusion at 140μg/kg/minute for six minutes. Blood pressure and 12-lead electrocardiogram were obtained every minute and the patient’s symptoms were recorded. Resting heart rate was 67. Heart rate three minutes into the adenosine infusion was 73, and heart rate six minutes into the adenosine infusion was 85. Resting blood pressure was 152/69. Blood pressure three minutes into the adenosine infusion was 128/54, and blood pressure six minutes into the adenosine infusion was 70/47. Resting electrocardiogram showed normal sinus rhythm, small inferior Q-waves, and ST–T changes. There was an additional 1–2mm ST segment depression in the electrocardiographic leads I, AVL, and V2, plus 1–3mm additional ST segment elevation was noted in II, III, and AVF during and up to three minutes-post adenosine infusion (see Figure 2). There were occasional premature ventricular complexes and premature atrial complexes before, during, and post-adenosine infusion. The patient did not report chest pain during or after adenosine infusion.

Three minutes into the adenosine infusion, 44mCi of technetium 99m sestamibi was injected intravenously. One hour and 50 minutes later, the stress (adenosine) myocardial perfusion images were obtained by gated SPECT.

SPECT images were acquired with a dual-head gamma camera using the step-and-shoot detector rotation, obtaining 32 projections over 180º arcs (45º right anterior oblique to 45º left posterior oblique). The camera was equipped with a low-energy, high-resolution collimator. Rest and stress images were acquired with a 20% window centered over the 140KeV photo peak. Gated acquisitions were obtained using eight frames per cardiac cycle with a 40% acceptance window. Acquisition times were 40 seconds per projection. The summed projection data sets were filtered with a butterworth filter (order 5 cut-off 0.33). Short-, vertical-, long-, and horizontal-axis images were evaluated for transient, partially reversible, and fixed perfusion defects.

The rest and stress (adenosine) myocardial perfusion images revealed normal-sized left ventricle and mild to moderate transient myocardial perfusion defect (mild to moderate ischemia) superimposed on mild fixed myocardial perfusion defect (superimposed on mild scar) involving the inferior, inferoapex, and inferolateral wall of the left ventricle (see Figure 3). There were hypokinetic inferior, inferoapex, and inferolateral walls of the left ventricle, with resting global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40%. The right ventricle was normal in size and function.

Following the adenosine myocardial perfusion scanning, the patient underwent cardiac catheterization. Cardiac catheterization showed normal left main, left anterior descending, and circumflex arteries. The right coronary artery showed a 75% stenosis in the mid segment (see Figure 4). The patient had a 3.5x16mm stent deployed without any complications. Her post-procedure course in the hospital was uneventful and she was discharged the following day in a stable condition.


Adenosine acts via its four subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) of receptors in the coronary artery.1 A2A adenosine receptor is the predominant subtype on the endothelium and smooth muscle of the coronary blood vessels that causes coronary vasodilatation.1,2 However, A2B subtype has also been reported in the coronary vessels and may play a role in coronary vasodilatation but to a lesser extent in normal than in pathophysiological situations.1,3 On the other hand, both A1 and A3 adenosine receptors have been shown to play an inhibitory role in the regulation of coronary blood flow.4,5

In this case history, transient myocardial perfusion defect with corresponding ST segment elevation has been noted with adenosine infusion induced ischemia.6,7 This has been postulated to be secondary to myocardial ischemia that occurs during adenosine infusion, which causes a fall in regional coronary flow below resting levels caused by a steal phenomenon.8 When these patients were treated with anti-anginal medications and re-studied by echocardiography, wall motion abnormality and ST depression were less frequent.9 Rare cases of MI after adenosine stress testing have been reported.10 However, adenosine myocardial perfusion scanning has been safely performed within 24 hours after an uncomplicated MI.11 We reported a case of adenosine-induced coronary vasospasm with significant ST elevation in a patient with normal coronary arteries.12 Although there could be similarities between this case and the one reported earlier without significant coronary artery disease where A1 receptor activation by adenosine in the vascular smooth muscles may provide an explanation, other possible explanations should be considered. These include the overexpression of A1 receptors compared with A2A/B receptors in the damaged endothelium and/or underlying smooth muscle and/or the increase in sympathetic tone due to adenosine infusion causing vasospasm. Finally, unless we fully understand the pharmacology of adenosine receptors in diseased coronary artery, these are mere speculations based on recent work that shows more heterogeneity of the adenosine receptor population in animal models than previously appreciated.1


  1. Abebe W, Hussain T, Olanrewaju H, Mustafa SJ, Role of nitric oxide in adenosine receptor-mediated relaxation of procine coronary artery, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 1995;269:H1672–8.
  2. Tabrizchi R, Bedi S, Pharmacology of adenosine receptors in the vasculature, Pharmacol Ther, 2001;91:133–47.
  3. Morrison RA, Talukder MAH, Ledent C, Mustafa SJ, The cardiac effects of adenosine in A2A receptor knockout hearts: uncovering A2B receptors, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2002;282:H437–44.
  4. Tawfik HE, Schnermann J, Oldenburg PJ, Mustafa SJ, Role of A1 adenosine receptors in regulation of vascular tone, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2005;288(3):H1411–16.
  5. Talukder MAH, Morrison RR, Jacobson MA, et al., Targeted deletion of adenosine A3 receptors augments adenosine-induced coronary flow in isolated mouse heart, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2002;282:H2183–9.
  6. Picano E, Simonetti I, Masini M, et al., Transient myocardial dysfunction during pharmacologic vasodilation as an index of reduced coronary reserve: a coronary hemodynamic and echocardiographic study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986;8:84–90.
  7. Iskandrian AS, Heo J, Nguyen T, et al., Assessment of coronary artery disease using single-photon emission computed tomography with thallium-201 during adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia, Am J Cardiol, 1991;67:1190–94.
  8. Patterson RE, Kirk ES, Coronary steal mechanisms in dogs with one-vessel occlusion and other arteries normal, Circulation, 1983;67:1009–15.
  9. Lattanzi F, Picano E, Bolognese L, et al., Inhibition of dipyridamole-induced ischemia by antianginal therapy in humans: correlation with exercise electrocardiography, Circulation, 1991;83:1256–62.
  10. Polad JE, Wilson LM, Myocardial infarction during adenosine stress test, Heart, 2002;87(2):E2.
  11. Kulhanek J, Sorrell VL, Ershadi RE, et al., Adenosine myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomographic stress testing 24–72 h after uncomplicated myocardial infarction, Intl J Cardiovasc Imag, 2002;18:269–72.
  12. Golzar J, Mustafa SJ, Movahed A, Chest pain and ST segment elevation three minutes after completion of adenosine pharmacological stress testing, J Nucl Cardiol, 2004;11:744–6.