EuroPCR 2022: Late-breaking Science Video Collection
Published: 13 May 2022
-
Views:
2468 -
Likes:
7
-
Views:
2468 -
Likes:
7
-
Up Next
-
4m 27sPart 2 | Session 17 EuroPCR 22: JenaValve TAVR System for the Treatment of Aortic Regurgitation
-
7m 7sPart 2 | Session 18 EuroPCR 22: Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair with PASCAL System
-
6m 53s
-
20m 24sPart 1 | Session 1 EuroPCR 22 Late-breaking Science Preview Joost Daemen, Nicolas M Van Mieghem
-
27m 14sPart 1 | Session 2 EuroPCR 22 Late-breaking Science Wrap-Up Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Joost Daemen
-
3m 28sPart 2 | Session 1 EuroPCR 22: AQVA Study Shows Superiority in QFR-Based Virtual PCI Arm Simone Biscaglia
-
5m 10sPart 2 | Session 2 EuroPCR 22: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Ultrasound RDN in radiance-HTN SOLO & Trio Ajay J Kirtane
-
7m 50sPart 2 | Session 3 EuroPCR 22: Optimize PRO Interim Analysis Finds New Technique is "Best-in-Class" Kendra J Grubb
-
5m 56sPart 2 | Session 4 EuroPCR 22: MASTER-DAPT Sub-Analysis Shows Consistent Results in Complex PCI Patients Marco Valgimigli
-
3m 34sPart 2 | Session 5 EuroPCR 22: CRUZ-HBR Indicates Use Of Supraflux™ Cruz Stent Is Favourable David Leistner
-
4m 49sPart 2 | Session 6 EuroPCR 22: ASTRO-TAVI Shows Improved Neurological Outcomes With Neurointervention Amos Levi
-
3m 53sPart 2 | Session 7 EuroPCR 22: Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of ACURATE neo2™ Andrea Buono
-
4m 20sPart 2 | Session 8 EuroPCR 22: DECISION QFR Shows Increased Practicability and Shorter Procedure Time for Revasc. Taku Asano
-
2m 18sPart 2 | Session 9 EuroPCR 22: SYNERGY™ Non-inferior to BioMatrix NeoFlex in OCT SORT-OUT VIII Michael Mæng
-
5m 9sPart 2 | Session 10 EuroPCR 22: ROLEX Study Finds Promising Results in CAD Pts With the Resolute Onyx Giuseppe Tarantini
-
7m 18sPart 2 | Session 11 EuroPCR 22: Balloon Vs Self-Expanding Valves in Valve-in-Valve TAVI Josep Rodés-Cabau
-
5m 52sPart 2 | Session 12 EuroPCR 22: MitraClip in Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation Antonio Popolo Rubbio
-
2m 15sPart 2 | Session 13 EuroPCR 22: SCB with Micro-Reservoir Technology in Coronary Lesions Praveen Chandra
-
4m 46sPart 2 | Session 14 EuroPCR 22: FORWARD PRO Study Shows No Durability Issues After 3 Years Nicolas M Van Mieghem
-
4m 25sPart 2 | Session 15 EuroPCR 22: DEB & DES in the Treatment of Diffuse CAD Alfonso Ielasi
Overview
Our regular review series View from the Thoraxcenter hosted by Prof Nicolas Van Mieghem and Dr Joost Daemen (Thoraxcentre, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL) provide a concise analysis of the late-breaking science trials and spotlight questions that could change treatment strategies in interventional cardiology.
Short, accessible Expert Interviews will be available with select faculty focusing on the results, applicability, and impact on future research.
More from this programme
Part 1
View from the Thoraxcenter
Part 2
Expert Interviews
Faculty Biographies
Bernardo Cortese
Dr Bernardo Cortese is Consultant Interventional Cardiologist for coronary and structural heart disease at the Columbus Clinic in Milano, and the Vercelli Hospital in Italy. He is the CEO of the DCB Academy, and Director of Cardiology at Clinical San Carlo in Milano.
Transcript
Study Background
The background of EASTBOURNE registry is the drug-coated balloon. The novelty in this area is the sirolimus. Sirolimus is a new drug that came out in 2016. So from the very beginning of this new technology by means of Magic Touch DCB we decided to do this prospective registry because we needed to have some good, reliable, clinical data with this new device.
Study Design and Population
The design of the EASTBOURNE study is a prospective registry with central adjudication of all the events, a multi-center study from all around the world. We have enrolled 2,123 patients rendering this the largest study ever done on DCB.
Device Characteristics
The device used in the EASTBOURNE registry is a novel drug-coated balloon eluting sirolimus. And Magic Touch is a DCB which has a new technology, which with the nano-capsule is able to deliver correctly sirolimus to the vessel wall and to keep it there for at least one month. This is the timeline where we want the drug to interrupt the restenotic process.
Key Findings
The key findings are very reassuring in terms of safety and efficacy. We have found the primary endpoint of TLR in 6% of the population with a high variability between in-stent restenosis patients and de novo lesions. Like for PCB, Paclitaxel-coated balloons in-stent restenosis has a higher TLR. Whereas de novo lessions has a very low TLR of 2%. The other endpoints like MACE and bleedings are very low and we are optimistic on the results of this study.
Safety Signals
We have observed no safety signals in terms of bleeding as I was mentioning before, the bleeding rate was very low even because with the DCB technology you may have a very low duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and we have had no thrombotic problems no thrombotic occlusions in our population.
Take-Home Messages
The key take-home message for the clinician regarding EASTBOURNE registry is that, the Sirolimus-coated balloon, this type of Sirolimus-coated balloon is already here showing a very good safety and efficacy profile. So we may want to use these in a real world population. Like the one that has been a role in EASTBOURNE. This is a real world population a lot of calcified lesions, very long lesions. So we can be safe to use this device in this setting.
Next Steps
The next steps are already here because we are running two randomised clinical trials. TRANSFORM I is evaluating this device versus Paclitaxel-coated balloon and TRANSFORM II study is another randomised clinical trial international, which is comparing Magic Touch versus Xience in multivessel diseases. So in the next two years we will have more data on this device.