Bridging the Gap in Arrhythmia Detection: Why 14 Days Matter
Bridging the Gap in Arrhythmia Detection: Why 14 Days Matter
This expert-led webinar, moderated by Prof Dominik Linz, explored the limitations of current approaches and the proven benefits of extending monitoring to 14 days.
Prof Jay Wright highlighted the shortcomings of standard monitoring and their clinical consequences, while Dr Suneet Mittal presented findings from the CAMELOT study, demonstrating how 14-day monitoring significantly improved arrhythmia detection, reduced hospitalisations, and enhanced clinical decision-making. Prof Patrick Badertscher provided real-world insights from European clinical practice, sharing data on how Zio’s extended monitoring improved workflow, efficiency, and patient outcomes.
The session concluded with a live Q&A, addressing key topics such as reimbursement, implementation challenges, and patient adherence. Attendees discovered why 14-day monitoring was transforming arrhythmia detection and patient care.
Learning Objectives
- Identify the gaps in the standard ACM approach and understand its limitations in detecting arrhythmias
- Explain the scientific rationale for extending monitoring duration, supported by key findings from clinical studies
- Evaluate real-world European clinical data on extended monitoring and understand how Zio improves detection, workflow efficiency, and patient outcomes
Target Audience
- Cardiologists
- Electrophysiologists
- Stroke Neurologists
- Cardiac Physiologists
More from this programme
Part 1
Welcome
Part 2
The Unseen Burden of Missed Arrhythmias – Why Current Monitoring Falls Short
In the second part of this video series, Prof Jay Wright, dives into the limitations of traditional monitoring systems, shedding light on their clinical implications. Through a detailed analysis, Prof Jay Wright outlines the key areas where conventional monitoring falls short.
Part 3
The Evidence for Extended Monitoring – How Long is Enough?
Dr Suneet Mittal presents findings from the CAMELOT study, exploring the impact of 14-day monitoring on arrhythmia detection, hospitalisation rates, and clinical decision-making. He reviews the clinical evidence supporting its effectiveness, highlighting how extended monitoring leads to more accurate diagnoses and better patient outcomes. Dr. Mittal also discusses the role of prolonged monitoring in improving the overall efficiency of clinical workflows in arrhythmia management.
Part 4
Real-World Insights – The European Experience with Zio
Prof Patrick Badertscher provides real-world insights from European clinical practice, sharing data on how Zio’s extended monitoring improves workflow, efficiency, and patient outcomes. He reviews the clinical evidence, demonstrating how the extended monitoring period streamlines procedures and enhances the accuracy of arrhythmia detection. Prof Badertscher also discusses how Zio’s approach contributes to better patient management and overall improvements in clinical practice.
Part 5
Q&A and Closing Summary
In the final part of the video series, Prof Dominik Linz thanks the faculty for joining and provides his closing remarks on this webinar.
| 1 session | |
| Watch now |
Faculty Biographies
Dominik Linz
Cardiologist and Associate Professor
Personal History
Dr Dominik Linz is a clinician-scientist who has developed a national and international reputation in the field of cardiac arrhythmia research.2
He is a cardiologist and associate professor at Maastricht University Medical Center+ in the Netherlands.
Academic History
In 2007, Dr Linz earned his MD from Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany. He then joined the world-renowned translational cardiovascular research institute (CARIM) in Maastricht, the Netherlands and obtained his PhD in Medicine in 2013. Following this, he pursued his cardiology training at the University Hospital in Homburg/Saar, Germany.1
The focus of his work has been to understand the pathophysiology and mechanisms underlying atrial arrhythmias and the development of treatment approaches.2
Career…