-
Part 4 | Session 1 4 Trials That Will Change My Practice with Dr Ambarish Pandey
-
Part 4 | Session 2 4 Trials That Will Change My Practice with Dr Dipti Itchhaporia
-
Part 1 | Session 1 View from the Thoraxcenter: What's Hot at ACC.25?
-
Part 1 | Session 2 View from the Thoraxcenter: ACC 25 Wrap-Up
-
Part 2 | Session 1 ADVANCE-HTN: Lorundrostat in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension
-
Part 2 | Session 2 STRIDE: Semaglutide for Functional Capacity in Patients with T2D and PAD
-
Part 2 | Session 3 API-CAT: Reduced Vs Full Dose Apixaban for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
-
Part 2 | Session 4 FRESH-UP: Liberal Intake Vs Fluid Restriction in Chronic Heart Failure
-
Part 2 | Session 5 SOUL: Semaglutide in Patients with T2D
-
Part 2 | Session 6 BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Cerebral Embolic Protection in TAVI
-
Part 3 | Session 1 The Phase 3 REVERSE-IT Trial
-
Part 3 | Session 2 EVOLUT Low Risk: 5Y Outcomes After TAVR or SAVR in Low-Risk Patients with AS
-
Part 3 | Session 3 SMART-CHOICE 3: Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High-Risk PCI Patients
-
Part 3 | Session 6 MIGHTy-Heart: Mobile Integrated Health in Heart Failure
-
Part 3 | Session 10 Lifetime Benefit by Control of Modifiable Risk Factors
ACC 2025 - Principal results from autologous cell therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) show favourable safety outcomes, however, the study did not meet its primary efficacy outcome using 6 minute walking rests as 3rd F-S tier.
Dr Amish Raval (UW Health University Hospital Interventional Cardiology Clinic, WI, US) joins us onsite at ACC to discuss the findings from the prospective, multi-center CardiAMP-HF trial (NCT02438306), investigating autologous cell therapy with the CardiAMP system (BioCardia, Inc.) compared to sham control treatment in HFrEF patients. The primary outcome measure was a composite endpoint of all-cause death, non-fatal major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and change for six-minute walking distance from baseline to month 12.
Findings showed that autologous cell therapy was well-tolerated with trends towards benefit in reduced mortality and MACCE for the treatment group at 2 years, however, the trial did not meet its primary efficacy outcome.
Interview Questions:
1. What is the importance behind the CardiAMP-HF trial?
2. What was the study design, patient population and key findings?
3. Are there plans for a CardiAMP-HF II trial?
4. What were the key take-home messages?
Recorded on-site at ACC in Chicago, 2025.
Editors: Yazmin Sadik, Jordan Rance
Videographers: Tom Green, David Ben-Harosh
Support: This is an independent interview produced by Radcliffe Cardiology.
Keep up-to-date with our video collection on the American College of Cardiology's 74th annual congress, covering late-breaking science, featured science and clinical horizon sessions. Don't miss the preview and wrap-up of the congress in our View From the Thoraxcenter series, concise Expert Interviews with select faculty offering take-home messages for practice, and our Highlights summarising the most influential trials.
Comments