-
Part 3 | Session 3 SMART-CHOICE 3: Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High-Risk PCI Patients
-
Part 3 | Session 6 MIGHTy-Heart: Mobile Integrated Health in Heart Failure
-
Part 3 | Session 10 Lifetime Benefit by Control of Modifiable Risk Factors
-
Part 3 | Session 11 CardiAMP-HF: Autologous Cell Therapy in Patients With HFrEF
-
Part 4 | Session 1 4 Trials That Will Change My Practice with Dr Ambarish Pandey
-
Part 4 | Session 2 4 Trials That Will Change My Practice with Dr Dipti Itchhaporia
-
Part 1 | Session 1 View from the Thoraxcenter: What's Hot at ACC.25?
-
Part 1 | Session 2 View from the Thoraxcenter: ACC 25 Wrap-Up
-
Part 2 | Session 1 ADVANCE-HTN: Lorundrostat in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension
-
Part 2 | Session 2 STRIDE: Semaglutide for Functional Capacity in Patients with T2D and PAD
-
Part 2 | Session 3 API-CAT: Reduced Vs Full Dose Apixaban for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
-
Part 2 | Session 4 FRESH-UP: Liberal Intake Vs Fluid Restriction in Chronic Heart Failure
-
Part 2 | Session 5 SOUL: Semaglutide in Patients with T2D
-
Part 2 | Session 6 BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Cerebral Embolic Protection in TAVI
-
Part 3 | Session 1 The Phase 3 REVERSE-IT Trial
ACC 2025 - EVOLUT Low-Risk findings show the Medtronic TAVR system is a safe and effective treatment for aortic stenosis vs surgical valves at five years.
Dr Michael Reardon (Houston Methodist, Texas, US) joins us onsite at ACC to discuss the EVOLUT Low Risk trial (NCT02701283; Medtronic Cardiovascular), investigating the safety and effectiveness of the Medtronic TAVR system compared to surgical aortic valve replacement In low-risk patients with AS. The primary outcome measures were the rates of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke.
Key findings at five years show that the primary endpoint in TAVR remained similar to surgery at every time point across the trial. There were no more reinterventions, and no more moderate or greater paravalvular leak in the TAVR arm compared to the surgical arm. The EVOLUT TAVR system showed superior haemodynamics at every time point across the trial.
Interview Questions:
1. What is the reasoning behind the trial?
2. What was the study design and patient population?
3. What were the key findings?
4. What are the take-home messages for practice?
5. What is the potential impact of these findings on future guidelines?
6. What further research is required?
Recorded on-site at ACC in Chicago, 2025.
Editors: Yazmin Sadik, Jordan Rance
Videographers: Dan Brent, David Ben-Harosh
Support: This is an independent interview produced by Radcliffe Cardiology.
Keep up-to-date with our video collection on the American College of Cardiology's 74th annual congress, covering late-breaking science, featured science and clinical horizon sessions. Don't miss the preview and wrap-up of the congress in our View From the Thoraxcenter series, concise Expert Interviews with select faculty offering take-home messages for practice, and our Highlights summarising the most influential trials.
More from this programme
Faculty Biographies
Michael J Reardon
Dr Michael J. Reardon holds the position of Clinical Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery at MD Anderson Cancer Center and created the multi-institution, multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team with HMH and MDA.
He has served as elected president of the medical staff for the HMH and received numerous awards including the Overstreet Award and Noon Award. He currently holds the Allison Family Distinguished Chair of Cardiovascular Research and divides his time between building innovative clinical, research and educational programs.
Comments