ACC 25 - Findings of the MIGHTy-Heart study shows no difference between mobile integrated healthcare and a traditional transitions of care coordinator approach in 30-day all-cause readmissions or health status.
Dr Ruth Masterson Creber (Columbia University, New York, US) joins us onsite at ACC to discuss the findings from MIGHTy-Heart, a comparative effectiveness study that evaluated two different post-discharge care approaches for patients hospitalized with heart failure. (NCT04662541) The trial compared a traditional Transitions of Care Coordinator approach to a Mobile Integrated Health model to determine which was more effective at reducing 30-day hospital readmissions and improving patient-reported health-related quality of life.
Findings showed no difference between the two study arms in 30-day all-cause readmissions or health status, however there were significant interaction effects that suggest women and younger patients could benefit from MIH intervention over the TOCC intervention.
Interview Questions:
- What is the importance of this study?
- Could you tell us about the study design and patient population?
- What training was required for the community paramedics to effectively manage heart failure patients in the home setting?
- What are the key outcomes?
- What implications do these findings have for heart failure care models, particularly in rural or underserved areas?
- What are your key take-home messages?
Recorded onsite at the ACC Conference 2025, in Chicago.
Editors: Jordan Rance, Yazmin Sadik
Video Specialists: Dan Brent, David Ben-Harosh
Comments