Clinical outcome of treatment with or without a final kissing balloon technique for bifurcation in-stent restenosis lesions

Takayuki Yabe
Mikihoto Toda
Rine Nakanishi
Daiga Saito
Ippei Watanabe
Ryo Okubo
Hideo Amano
Takanori Ikeda

BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) with bifurcation lesions has not been well explored. We examined the clinical outcomes between final kissing balloon technique (FKBT) after stent implantation and single-stent implantation without FKBT for bifurcation ISR lesions.

METHODS: We identified 115 consecutive ISR with bifurcation lesions among 108 patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation. The patients were divided into the FKBT group (34 patients, 35 lesions) and the non-FKBT group (74 patients, 80 lesions).

RESULTS: Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade of side branch was significantly greater in the patients with FKBT than those without FKBT after coronary intervention (2.80±0.46 vs. 2.65±0.68, p=0.04), but this difference was attenuated and was no longer statistically significant at the time of follow-up (2.80±0.48 vs. 2.80±0.60, p=0.97). During a mean follow-up of 47.8±23.6 months, there were no significant differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In multivariate analysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.99, p=0.02) was an independent predictor of MACE. Contrast volume (170.71±47.17ml vs. 136.46±55.56ml, p=0.002) and radiation dose (1.44±1.65Gy vs. 0.96±0.46Gy, p=0.02) were significantly higher in the FKBT group than in the non-FKBT group.

CONCLUSIONS: Single-stent implantation without FKBT may be a sufficient treatment strategy for bifurcation ISR lesions.

Read More

J Cardiol. 2017 Jun;69(6):808-814.