Remote Navigation for Complex Arrhythmia

Login or register to view PDF.
Abstract

Magnetic navigation has been established as an alternative to conventional, manual catheter navigation for invasive electrophysiology interventions about a decade ago. Besides the obvious advantage of radiation protection for the operator who is positioned remotely from the patient, there are additional benefits of steering the tip of a very floppy catheter. This manuscript reviews the published evidence from simple arrhythmias in patients with normal cardiac anatomy to the most complex congenital heart disease. This progress was made possible by the introduction of improved catheters and most importantly irrigated-tip electrodes.

Disclosure
Sabine Ernst is a consultant in Biosense Webster and Stereotaxis, Inc. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Correspondence
Sabine Ernst, Consultant Cardiologist/Electrophysiologist, Reader in Cardiology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, Sydney Street, SW3 6NP, London, UK. E: s.ernst@rbht.nhs.uk
Support
This project was supported by the NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit of Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London. This report is independent research by the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit Funding Scheme. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.
Received date
13 March 2013
Accepted date
18 April 2013
Citation
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review 2013;2(1):53-8
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2013.2.1.53

Catheter ablation has moved from ablation of ‘simple’ substrates like accessory pathways,1 atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias (AVNRTs)2 and re-entrant or focal tachycardia (of either ventricular or atrial origin)3–5 in recent years to more complex arrhythmias such as atrial or ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation.6–8 Even patients with complex congenital heart disease that may present with a very unusual cardiac anatomy are nowadays candidates for curatively intended catheter ablation procedures.9,10 Some patients are challenging because of the multitude of arrhythmias they present with (e.g. in Ebstein’s anomaly11 or patients after Fontan palliation12). This paper aims to review the contribution of advanced mapping technology using three-dimensional (3D) image integration and remote magnetic navigation (RMN) for patients with complex arrhythmia, or simple arrhythmias in the presence of congenital heart disease.

Remote Navigation

A detailed description of this system has been previously published.13,14 In brief, it consists of two computer-controlled permanent magnets positioned on either side of the fluoroscopy table (AXIOM Artis®, Siemens, Germany). A uniform magnetic field (0.08 or 0.10 Tesla) is created inside the chest of the patient of about 20 centimetres (cm) diameter. The soft mapping catheter aligns parallel to the externally controlled direction of the magnetic field due to three small permanent magnets embedded in the catheter tip. Changing the direction of the outer magnetic field navigates the tip of the catheter accordingly. The combination with a mechanical motor drive to advance or retract the catheter allows complete remote control of the catheter.14

Clinical Experience in Simple Arrhythmia Ablation

When using a novel system, it is wise to address simple procedures first and then progress to more and more challenging arrhythmias. This also allows the operator to convert to conventional ablation catheters should the remote procedure prove to be difficult or impossible. Clinical experiences from various groups around the world have been published over the last decade demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of the system in remote catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs),14–19 right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia,20 atrial flutter21,22 and atrial tachycardias.23 Interestingly, right atrial isthmus-dependent flutter seemed to be a challenging arrhythmia, which was only successfully ‘solved’ when irrigated-tip catheters became available.23–25

Atrial Flutter Ablation with Remote Magnetic Navigation

The acute ablation results for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter varied between 80 and 96 % when an 8-millimetres (mm) solid-tip magnetic catheter was used22–25 or 92 % when a 3.5-mm irrigated-tip magnetic catheter was used.24 Although the magnetic navigation approach led to comparable results acutely with lower fluoroscopy time, it required prolonged radiofrequency current application and procedure times compared with the conventional approach.26,27

Moreover, it appears that in the long term (six months) freedom from atrial flutter recurrence tends to decrease in the magnetic navigation group compared with the conventional approach (73 versus 89 %) in one prospective randomised study.23 Although inter-individual anatomical variations such as concave cavotricuspid isthmus, prominent pectinate muscles or existence of a sub-Eustachian pouches, can account for some of the failures,24 regardless of the techniques used,23 it has been suggested that the technology is more effective in creating focal effective lesions rather than deep linear transmural lesions, maybe related to the necessary design of the catheter, which requires the small magnets to be embedded in its tip.23 Additionally, the incidence of char formation with the 8-mm solid-tip catheter seemed to have been higher, possibly due to a reduced tip-to-tissue surface area of contact.

Efficacy of Remote Magbetic Navigation

Open in new tab

Solutions to overcome these potential difficulties include looping of the catheter with placement of the tip of the ablation catheter more parallel to the tissue or in a more wedged position, delivering more power for longer duration, increasing the strength of the magnetic field in order to allow for better contact and higher energy delivery or, more importantly, using irrigated-tip catheters (see Table 1).24,25,28

Remote Magnetic Navigation in Simpler Electrophysiological Substrates

As mentioned above, the results of some of the previous studies did not support the use of the RMN system with an 8-mm tip electrode for ablation of common right atrial flutter.23 However, encouraging acute results are reported when the 3.5-mm irrigated-tip catheter was utilised (see Table 1).24,25,28

Atrioventricular Nodal Re-entrant Tachycardia

Previous studies have emphasised the efficacy and safety of the technique in treating more discrete substrates such as slow pathway ablation/modulation for atrioventricular (AV) re-entrant tachycardia.15,16 When direct comparison was made between RMN ablation and conventional approach, magnetic guidance seemed similar, if not superior, in terms of efficacy compared with conventional catheter ablation of AVNRT. Previous studies reported comparable results when conventional techniques were used.29–31 Although a longer time between insertion of the ablation catheter and placement of the first radiofrequency lesion was necessary in the magnetic-guided ablation cohort; there was a trend towards a shorter total radiofrequency time in the magnetic guidance group.16 Moreover, the median physician radiation exposure time was three-times lower than the patient exposure time.15 No significant complications occurred. One transitory AV block reported in the magnetic group fully recovered.16

Accessory Pathways

In patients with other discrete substrates, such as accessory pathways, remote magnetic-guided ablation showed initially moderately good results,17,18 but outcomes improved dramatically with the learning curve and perfected technology,17,28 with safe profile demonstrated even in the most challenging situations such as para-Hisian substrates (see Table 1).19

Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia

Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias also seem to be safely and effectively targeted with the RMN system. The magnetic-guided mapping and ablation appear particularly useful in difficult positions, such as aortic cusps or papillary muscle VTs.28 In these situations, manual navigation is significantly restricted by the multiple curves of the catheter, whereas the manoeuvrability of the soft magnetic catheter is not hindered by the specific location. Moreover, the stability of the magnetic catheter due to the constant magnetic force directing the tip during the radiofrequency application makes the procedure safer and more effective.20,28,32

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After the favourable outcomes of the SVT ablation procedures, the next ‘goal’ was naturally to perform remote-controlled atrial fibrillation (AF) procedures.33 However, an 8-mm ablation catheter was the only alternative available to the 4-mm tip catheter used in SVT ablations; it was to no surprise that remote ablation was possible, but ran the known higher risk of clot formation at the tip (as compared with irrigated-tip catheters).34 Although the initially reported results in AF ablation using the RMN system and solid-tip magnetic catheter varied significantly among groups33–41 (see Table 1); more recent data using irrigated-tip magnetically navigated catheters showed more promising results with increased safety profile. The introduction of a magnetic catheter with an irrigated-tip allowed avoidance of the thromboembolic risk and several groups have published their results, which are comparable to conventional technologies.35–41 Two centres have jointly published their experience in a total of 71 patients with either paroxysmal or persistent AF. They reported safe and effective remote-controlled manipulation for reconstruction of the left atrium (LA) and mapping of the pulmonary veins (PVs). In three patients, a cross-over to conventional manual PV mapping was necessary to position the catheter in the right inferior PV.42

Additionally, the use of RMN was associated with markedly reduced fluoroscopy time, although at the expense of prolonged ablation and procedure durations. The lower fluoroscopy time likely results from the greater flexibility of the soft tip of the catheter, which does not require frequent radioscopic visualisation. Additionally, the risk of cardiac perforation remains extremely low in most studies. Although it has been argued that the operator must commute frequently between the control room and the operating room, the overall physical fatigue for the operator is markedly reduced when the system is used, as is the fluoroscopy exposure. Moreover, an additional mechanical ‘V drive’ has been recently introduced that allows to remotely steer a circumferential PV mapping catheter as well42 and avoid commuting (see Table 2).

Benefits and Disadvantages of the Remote Magnetic Navigation System

Open in new tab

3D Reconftructions

Open in new tab

Retrograde Transaortic Approach to the Right Atrium

Open in new tab

Combination of 3D Electroanatomical Mapping and Remote Magnetic Navigation

Using the integrated 3D electroanatomical system CARTO® RMT (Biosense Webster, Brussels, Belgium), the different vectors needed for 3D mapping are applied from the mapping system and the 3D reconstruction is displayed on the navigation workstation.37,43 All three systems (magnetic navigation, 3D mapping system and fluoroscopy) are registered such that the information is shown in a single combined fashion with picture-in-picture display. This was of great advantage during complex ablation procedures and allowed further reduction of the overall fluoroscopy exposure.

Additionally, both realtime and snapshot reviews of the intracavitary tracings can be displayed on the same screen. All the above generally imply less physical strain for the operator, and potentially better operator concentration, and more detailed and careful electrogram analysis. With the advent of the 3.5-mm atraumatic irrigated-tip magnetic catheters that can be used within the CARTO RMT platform, the risk of perforation, thromboembolic events and char formation have also decreased considerably.

Remote Controlled Catheter Ablation Via a Retrograde Access

Open in new tab

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

After the initial reports on right VT ablation,20,44 which in itself is a rather simple target in an easily accessible area, more difficult substrates of VT (including ischaemic and dilative cardiomyopathy) were targeted.32,45–50 Parallel to the growing evidence of conventional epicardial ablation for VT, the magnetic navigation system has been used in the epicardial space, which became possible when the irrigated catheter became available.50,51

Results on safety and feasibility of the technology in diagnosing and treating complex ventricular arrhythmias were initially reported in 200750,52 in both animal models52 and in humans,50 with good overall results and minimal fluoroscopy exposure using a 4-mm solid-tip magnetic catheter. Dinov et al.53 retrospectively analysed the long-term efficacy of a single procedure ablation for ischaemic VT and compared it with manual radiofrequency ablation in 102 patients using irrigated-tip catheters. Magnetic-guided radiofrequency ablation of ischaemic sustained VT proved to be equally efficient compared with manual ablation in terms of acute and long-term success rate, with the additional benefit of a significantly reduced fluoroscopy time and shorter radiofrequency time.

Similarly, Bauernfeind et al.28 have reported their overall experience with the RMN system in 610 patients, 83 of whom had undergone ablation for VT. The superiority of the magnetic system became more prominent in the VT group compared with other types of tachycardia where results were roughly comparable. More specifically, in the idiopathic forms of VT, where the substrate is more discrete, and stability and precision of the radiofrequency delivery is key, the system proved more efficacious than in the rest of the VT group – in the magnetic navigation group the success rate was 97 % compared with 79 % in the conventional group (p=0.026). Specific features of the system such as manoeuvrability, stability and constant contact seem to be particularly useful in these situations.

Successful Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Open in new tab

Although randomised data are scarce, a recent systematic review54 of the experience with the remote navigation system in VT ablation across 11 studies in 110 patients showed similar results, with an overall need for crossover to manual ablation in 14 % of the cases. Six patients out of the 110 developed complications: one AV block, two groin haematomas, one deep vein thrombosis, one stroke when a solid-tip magnetic catheter was used and a right ulnar palsy. Overall, a higher acute success rate (97 versus 81 %, p=0.03) and lower rate of arrhythmia recurrence (14 versus 50 %, p<0.01) were achieved in magnetic navigation procedures compared with manual catheter ablation. The use of the RMN system reduced the occurrence of major complications (0.34 versus 3.20 %, p=0.01) without compromising the efficacy compared with manual ablation. Additional decreased time of fluoroscopy exposure was noted across most studies.54

Remote Magnetic Navigation for Ablation of Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Arrhythmias in patients with complex congenital disease are a source of significant morbidity, haemodynamic deterioration and mortality.9,10 Medical treatment proves to be of limited efficacy, and ablative procedures have emerged as an alternative, but long-term results after ablation are somewhat sobering. In order to perform an ablation procedure in this patient cohort successfully, a careful review of the individual anatomy and details of the performed surgery (if applicable) needs to be performed. Precise understanding of the underlying anatomy (e.g. presence of intra-atrial baffles or baffle leaks) and the location of the conduction system is necessary to plan and execute an ablation procedure. Pre-procedural imaging and 3D reconstruction is of particular importance, since it is demonstrating the ‘up-to-date’ anatomical situation (see Figure 1). This can be assessed either by computerised tomography scans or by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Retrograde transaortic approach using magnetic navigation is particularly useful in patients with congenital heart disease and “difficult access” to the targeted chamber.

In patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) after Mustard/ Senning operation, magnetic navigation is especially convenient by using a retrograde approach to cross the aortic valve (see Figure 2). Similarly to the experience in left-sided accessory pathway ablation, the magnetic catheter can then be navigated across the AV valve to sequentially map the atrial chambers during permanent tachycardia. Several groups have confirmed the applicability of the remote navigation system in this patient cohort, with excellent outcome data.55–57

Another challenging group consists of patients with physiologically univentricular hearts that underwent surgery creating either an atriopulmonary (AP) Fontan (right atrium [RA] to pulmonary artery)58 or its modern modification of total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC)59 (see Figure 3). The prevalence of post-Fontan patients with SVTs is continuously increasing as the population ages and is associated not only with morbidity but also mortality.60 Although numerous studies have been published on mapping and ablation of univentricular heart-associated SVTs,12,61–64 most of them focused on AP-Fontan and relatively little is known about TCPC-associated SVTs. In the TCPC cohort, access to the tunnel can be easily achieved by venous puncture, but the atrial chambers are not directly accessible. Using the same retrograde approach as in the transposition of the great arteries (TGA) group, retrograde access was easily achieved and allowed mapping of both atrial chambers (see Figure 2). We recently demonstrated that TCPC patients in fact present with various arrhythmias, which consist mostly of re-entry around the right-sided AV valve (50.0 %), but also with ectopic tachycardia (12.5 %) and AVNRT (37.5 %).65 All arrhythmias were addressed using the RMN system in combination with 3D electroanatomical mapping and 3D image integration. Despite the need for a mean of 1.5 procedures (mostly driven by redo procedures in one of the AVNRT cases), clinical follow-up so far has been favourable.

In the Fontan cohort, magnetic navigation does not intuitively seem to contribute beyond the advantage of 3D image integration and reach of the catheter. Large curve conventional catheters might still be difficult to manipulate in these massively enlarged RA; the advantage of higher contact force may allow delivering of full thickness lesions better than the magnetic system. However, especially in patients with double inlet ventricles who have undergone patch closure of an AV valve, magnetic navigation assists in gaining access to the space behind the patch.66 This is the missing part in peri-AV valve re-entry and access is gained retrogradely, followed by irrigated-tip catheter ablation. This might in fact be one of the explanations why double inlet left ventricle (DILV)-Fontan patients had a higher recurrence rate of atrial flutter since the so-called isthmus line was never blocked when ablating conventionally.9,12

Ventricular tachycardia is another challenge in the setting of adult congenital heart disease, since these patients are at a significantly higher risk of sudden cardiac death than their peers with normal cardiac anatomy. Patients with systemic right ventricles or after ventricular repair (e.g. in tetralogy of Fallot) are at particular risk.66–70Figure 4 gives an example of VT ablation in left ventricular non-compaction. In the majority of patients, epicardial access will not be an alternative since post-operatively most patients will no longer have a true epicardial space. Again, remote navigation will find its role in this cohort whenever endocardial access to a given area is challenging.

Conclusion

Especially when addressing catheter ablation in arrhythmias in complex patients (e.g. after reparative surgery for congenital heart disease), RMN is a valuable alternative to conventional ablation tools. The combination of magnetic navigation with 3D electroanatomical mapping systems and 3D image integration as well as the availability of irrigated tip equipped magnetic catheters were key for this achievement.

References
  1. Kuck KH, Schlüter M, Geiger M, et al. Radiofrequency current catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways. Lancet 1991;337:1557–61.
  2. Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, et al. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry, by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med 1992;327:313–8.
  3. Chen SA, Tai CT, Chiang CE, et al. Focal atrial tachycardia: reanalysis of the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics and prediction of successful radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:355–65.
  4. Hartzler GO. Electrode catheter ablation of refractory focal ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;2:1107–13.
  5. Saoudi N, Derumeaux G, Cribier A, Letac B. The role of catheter ablation techniques in the treatment of classic (type 1) atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991;14(11 Pt 2):2022–7.
  6. Haïssaguerre M, Shoda M, Jaïs P, et al. Mapping and ablation of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2002;106(8): 962–7.
  7. Jaïs P, Haïssaguerre M, Shah DC, et al. A focal source of atrial fibrillation treated by discrete radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 1997;95(3):572–6.
  8. Nakagawa H, Jackman WM. Use of a 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system for catheter ablation of macroreentrant right atrial tachycardia following atriotomy. J Electrocardiol 1999;32 Suppl:16–21.
  9. Walsh EP. Interventional electrophysiology in patients with congenital heart disease. Circulation 2007;115:3224–34.
  10. Yap SC, Harris L, Silversides CK, et al. Outcome of intraatrial re-entrant tachycardia catheter ablation in adults with congenital heart disease: negative impact of age and complex atrial surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1589–96.
  11. Cappato R, Schlüter M, Weiss C, et al. Radiofrequency current catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways in Ebstein’s anomaly. Circulation 1996;94:376–83.
  12. Yap SC, Harris L, Downar E, et al. Evolving electroanatomic substrate and intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia late after Fontan surgery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23:339–45.
  13. Faddis MN, Blume W, Finney J, et al. Novel, magnetically guided catheter for endocardial mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation 2002;106:2980–5.
  14. Ernst S, Ouyang F, Linder C, et al. Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system: magnetic remote catheter ablation. Circulation 2004;109:1472–5.
  15. Thornton AS, Janse P, Theuns DA, et al. Magnetic navigation in AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia study: early results of ablation with one- and three-magnet catheters. Europace 2006;8:225–30.
  16. Kerzner R, Sánchez JM, Osborn JL, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using a novel magnetic guidance system compared with a conventional approach. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:261–7.
  17. Chun JK, Ernst S, Matthews S, et al. Remote-controlled catheter ablation of accessory pathways: results from the magnetic laboratory. Eur Heart J 2007;28:190–5.
  18. Thornton AS, Rivero-Ayerza M, Knops P, Jordaens LJ. Magnetic navigation in left-sided AV reentrant tachycardias: Preliminary results of a retrograde approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18:467–72.
  19. Ernst S, Hachiya H, Chun JK, Ouyang F. Remote catheter ablation of parahisian accessory pathways using a novel magnetic navigation system--a report of two cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:659–62.
  20. Thornton AS, Jordaens LJ. Remote magnetic navigation for mapping and ablating right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. Heart rhythm 2006;3:691–6.
  21. Faddis MN, Chen J, Osborn J, et al. Magnetic guidance system for cardiac electrophysiology: a prospective trial of safety and efficacy in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1952–8.
  22. Arya A, Kottkamp H, Piorkowski C, et al. Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31:597–603.
  23. Vollmann D, Lüthje L, Seegers J, et al. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:603–10.
  24. Koektuerk B, Chun JK, Wissner E, et al. Cavotricuspid Isthmus Anatomy Determines The Success Of Remote Controlled Magnetic Bidirectional Block: A Comparsion Between Magnetic 8-mm Solid Tip And 3.5-mm Magnetic Irrigated Tip Catheter. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2011;11:103–14.
  25. Anné W, Schwagten B, Janse P, et al. Flutter ablation with remote magnetic navigation: comparison between the 8-mm tip, the irrigated tip and a manual approach. Acta Cardiol 2011;66:287–92.
  26. Sacher F, O’Neill MD, Jais P, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of 8-mm gold-tip, externally irrigated-tip and 8-mm platinum-iridium tip catheters for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18:709–13.
  27. Kottkamp H, Hügl B, Krauss B, et al. Electromagnetic versus fluoroscopic mapping of the inferior isthmus for ablation of typical atrial flutter: A prospective randomized study. Circulation 2000;102:2082–6.
  28. Bauernfeind T, Akca F, Schwagten B, et al. The magnetic navigation system allows safety and high efficacy for ablation of arrhythmias. Europace 2011;13:1015–21.
  29. Calkins H, Yong P, Miller JM, et al. Catheter ablation of APs, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction: final results of a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. The Atakr Multicenter Investigators Group. Circulation 1999;99:262–70.
  30. Wood MA, Orlov M, Ramaswamy K, et al. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for ablation of supraventricular tachycardias: a randomized, multicenter trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31:1313–21.
  31. Zhang YX, Lu CY, Xue Q, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia guided by magnetic navigation system: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional procedure. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:16–20.
  32. Szili-Torok T, Schwagten B, Akca F, et al. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias using remote magnetic navigation: a consecutive case-control study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23:948–54.
  33. Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al. Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1390–400.
  34. Di Biase L, Fahmy TS, Patel D, et al. Remote magnetic navigation: human experience in pulmonary vein ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:868–74.
  35. Di Biase L, Wang Y, Horton R, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: single-center experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20:1328–35.
  36. Ernst S, Berns E. ‘Two-by-two’ pulmonary vein isolation in the presence of a complete situs inversus and dextrocardia: use of magnetic navigation and 3D mapping with image integration. Europace 2009;11:1118–9.
  37. Chun KR, Wissner E, Koektuerk B, et al. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigatedtip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010;3:458–64.
  38. Miyazaki S, Shah AJ, Xhaët O, et al. Remote magnetic navigation with irrigated tip catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010;3:585–9.
  39. Arya A, Zaker-Shahrak R, Sommer P, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic catheter navigation: a case-control study. Europace 2011;13:45–50.
  40. Burkhardt JD, Di Biase L, Natale A. Remote magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: is ‘As Good as Manual’ good enough. Europace 2011;13:5–6.
  41. Lüthje L, Vollmann D, Seegers J, et al. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol 2011;100:1003–11.
  42. Nölker G, Gutleben KJ, Muntean B, et al. Novel robotic catheter manipulation system integrated with remote magnetic navigation for fully remote ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias: a two-centre evaluation. Europace 2012;14:1715–8.
  43. Ernst S, Chun JK, Koektuerk B, Kuck KH. Magnetic navigation and catheter ablation of right atrial ectopic tachycardia in the presence of a hemi-azygos continuation: a magnetic navigation case using 3D electroanatomical mapping. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20:99–102.
  44. Konstantinidou M, Koektuerk B, Wissner E, et al. Catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia: a simplified remote-controlled approach. Europace 2011; 13:696–700.
  45. Thornton AS, Res J, Mekel JM, Jordaens LJ. Use of advanced mapping and remote magnetic navigation to ablate left ventricular fascicular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:685–8.
  46. Burkhardt JD, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, et al. Remote magnetic navigation to map and ablate left coronary cusp ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:1142–4.
  47. Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Lakkireddy D, et al. Mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias with magnetic navigation: comparison between 4- and 8-mm catheter tips. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2009;26:133–7.
  48. Haghjoo M, Hindricks G, Bode K, et al. Initial clinical experience with the new irrigated tip magnetic catheter for ablation of scar-related sustained ventricular tachycardia: a small case series. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20:935–9.
  49. Arya A, Eitel C, Bollmann A, et al. Catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia in patients with electrical storm using remote magnetic catheter navigation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010;33:1312–8.
  50. Aryana A, d’Avila A, Heist EK, et al. Remote magnetic navigation to guide endocardial and epicardial catheter mapping of scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 2007;115:1191–200.
  51. Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Astudillo V, et al. Endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the left ventricle with the Remote Magnetic Navigation System and the 3.5-mm open irrigated magnetic catheter: results from a large singlecenter case-control series. Heart Rhythm 2010;7:1029–35.
  52. Ray IB, Dukkipati S, Houghtaling C, et al. Initial experience with a novel remote-guided magnetic catheter navigation system for left ventricular scar mapping and ablation in a porcine model of healed myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18:520–5.
  53. Dinov B, Schönbauer R, Wojdyla-Hordynska A, et al. Long- Term Efficacy of Single Procedure Remote Magnetic Catheter Navigation for Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia: A Retrospective Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23;499–505.
  54. Akca F, Önsesveren I, Jordaens L, Szili-Torok T. Safety and efficacy of the remote magnetic navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardias--a systematic review. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2012;34:65–71.
  55. Wu J, Deisenhofer I, Ammar S, et al. Acute and long-term outcome after catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients after the Mustard or Senning operation for D-transposition of the great arteries. Europace 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  56. Ernst S, Babu-Narayan SV, Keegan J, et al. Remote-controlled magnetic navigation and ablation with 3D image integration as an alternative approach in patients with intra-atrial baffle anatomy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2012;5:131–9.
  57. Akca F, Bauernfeind T, Witsenburg M, et al. Acute and longterm outcomes of catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation in patients with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:409–14.
  58. Fontan F, Baudet E. Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 1971;26:240–8.
  59. de Leval MR, Kilner P, Gewillig M, Bull C. Total cavopulmonary connection: a logical alternative to atriopulmonary connection for complex Fontan operations. Experimental studies and early clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:682–95.
  60. Diller GP, Giardini A, Dimopoulos K, et al. Predictors of morbidity and mortality in contemporary Fontan patients: results from a multicenter study including cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 321 patients. Eur Heart J 2010;31:3073–83.
  61. Wolf CM, Seslar SP, den Boer K, et al. Atrial remodeling after the Fontan operation. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1737–42.
  62. Fujita S, Takahashi K, Takeuchi D, et al. Management of late atrial tachyarrhythmia long after Fontan operation. J Cardiol 2009;53:410–6.
  63. De Groot NM, Blom N, Vd Wall EE, Schalij MJ. Different mechanisms underlying consecutive, postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias in a Fontan patient. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:e18–20.
  64. Abrams DJ, Earley MJ, Sporton SC, et al. Comparison of noncontact and electroanatomic mapping to identify scar and arrhythmia late after the Fontan procedure. Circulation 2007;115:1738–46.
  65. Ueda A, Horduna I, Mantziari L, et al. Abstract 14959: Electrophysiological Characteristics in Different Types of Univentricular Physiological. Circulation 2012;126:A14959.
  66. Ueda A, Horduna I, Rubens M, Ernst S. Reaching the ventricular aspect of the inferior isthmus in a Fontan patient using magnetic navigation. Heart Rhythm 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
  67. Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, et al. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet 2000;356(9234):975–81.
  68. Tsai SF, Chan DP, Ro PS, et al. Rate of inducible ventricular arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2010;106:730–6.
  69. Diller GP, Kempny A, Liodakis E, et al. Left ventricular longitudinal function predicts life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia and death in adults with repaired tetralogy of fallot. Circulation 2012;125:2440–6.
  70. Gallego P, Gonzalez AE, Sanchez-Recalde A, et al. Incidence and predictors of sudden cardiac arrest in adults with congenital heart defects repaired before adult life. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:109–17.