Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Strategies for Improvement

Login or register to view PDF.
Abstract

During recent years, new conceptual, technical and drug strategies have led to improved early and late outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. These new strategies can be divided into the following three groups: optimisation of pre-operative patient selection and indications for and timing of the operation; peri-procedural refinements, including new techniques and instruments to avoid extracorporeal circulation, reduce aortic manipulation and minimise surgical access; and improvements to post-operative care, such as fast-track protocols and long-term drug therapy. In summary, the wide range of the surgical armamentarium available today allows cardiovascular surgeons to adapt the surgical strategy to individual patients and the given clinical scenario. This article aims to describe clinical rationales for the adoption of new concepts, provide an introduction to technical details and discuss clinical study results where appropriate.

Disclosure
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Correspondence
Ardawan J Rastan, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Leipzig, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany. E: rastan@rz.uni-leipzig.de
Received date
28 November 2010
Accepted date
07 January 2011
Citation
European Cardiology - Volume 7 Issue 1;2011:7(1):55-61
Correspondence
Ardawan J Rastan, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Leipzig, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany. E: rastan@rz.uni-leipzig.de
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2011.7.1.55
References
  1. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al., Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease, N Engl J Med, 2009;360:961–72.
    Crossref | PubMed
  2. Friedrich W Mohr, Three-year Outcomes of the SYNTAX Trial: 3VD Subgroup, presentation at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Sept 21, 2010.
  3. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, Guidelines on myocardial revascularization, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010;38:S1–52.
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Mohr FW, Rastan AJ, Serruys PW, et al., Impact of complex coronary anatomy in modern bypass surgery? Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial after two years, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011;141(1):130–40.
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Rastan AJ, Walther T, Falk V, et al., Does reasonable incomplete surgical revascularization affect early or long-term survival in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease receiving left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery bypass?, Circulation, 2009;120:S70–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  6. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al., The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease, EuroIntervention, 2005;1:219–27.
    PubMed
  7. Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, et al., Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX Score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, Am J Cardiol, 2007;99:1072–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al., 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, Circulation, 2009;120:2271–306.
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Silber S, Albertsson P, Avilés FF, et al., Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology, Eur Heart J, 2005;26:804–47.
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al., ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery), Circulation, 2004;110:e340–437.
    PubMed
  11. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al., ACCF/SCAI/STS/ AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009;53:530–3.
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Deyell MW, Ghali WA, Ross DB, et al., Alberta Provincial .Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Timing of nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality after non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, Am Heart J, 2010;159:490–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, et al., Evidence-Based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group, Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials, Anesthesiology, 2005;102:188–203.
    Crossref | PubMed
  14. Puskas J, Cheng D, Knight J, et al., Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS consensus conference, Innovation, 2005;1:3–27.
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, et al., Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005;46:872–82.
    Crossref | PubMed
  16. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, et al., Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization, Circulation, 2007;116:1145–52.
    Crossref | PubMed
  17. Sergeant P, Wouters P, Meyns B, et al., OPCAB versus early mortality and morbidity: an issue between clinical relevance and statistical significance, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2004;25:779–85.
    Crossref | PubMed
  18. Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, et al., Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004;127:142–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  19. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al., A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary artery bypass surgery, N Engl J Med, 2004;350:21–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  20. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al., Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group, On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery, N Engl J Med, 2009;361:1827–37.
    Crossref | PubMed
  21. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al., Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Early and 1-year graft patency rate, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: A randomized trial, JAMA, 2004;291:1841–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  22. Nathoe HM, vanDijk D, Jansen EW, et al., A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients, N Engl J Med, 2003;348:394–402.
    Crossref | PubMed
  23. Angelini GD, Culliford L, Smith DK, et al., Effects of on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery on graft patency, survival, and health-related quality of life: long-term follow-up of 2 randomized controlled trials, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009;137:295–303.
    Crossref | PubMed
  24. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al., One-year coronary bypass graft patency: A randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial, Circulation, 2004;110:3418–23.
    Crossref | PubMed
  25. Edelman JJ, Yan TD, Padang R, et al., Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies, Ann Thorac Surg, 2010;90:1384–90.
    Crossref | PubMed
  26. Calafiore AM, Giammarco GD, Teodori G, et al., Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass, Ann Thorac Surg, 1996;61:1658–63.
    Crossref | PubMed
  27. Cremer J, Strueber M, Wittwer T, et al., Off-bypass coronary bypass grafting via minithoracotomy using mechanical epicardial stabilization, Ann Thorac Surg, 1997;63:S79–83.
    Crossref | PubMed
  28. Diegeler A, Matin M, Kayser S, et al., Angiographic results after minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting using the minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting (MIDCAB) approach, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999;15:680–4.
    Crossref | PubMed
  29. Subramanian VA, McCabe JC, Geller CM., Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience, Ann Thorac Surg, 1997;64:1648–53.
    Crossref | PubMed
  30. Jacobs S, Holzhey D, Falk V, et al., High-risk patients with multivessel disease—is there a role for incomplete myocardial revascularization via minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting?, Heart Surg Forum, 2007;10:459–62
    Crossref | PubMed
  31. Wolf RK, Ohtsuka T, Flege JB Jr, Early results of thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvest using an ultrasonic scalpel, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1998;14:S54–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  32. Duhaylongsod FG, Mayfield WR, Wolf RK, Thoracoscopic harvest of the internal thoracic artery: a multicenter experience in 218 cases, Ann Thorac Surg, 1998;66:1012–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  33. McGinn JT Jr, Usman S, Lapierre H, et al., Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients, Circulation, 2009;120:S78–84.
    Crossref | PubMed
  34. Mack MJ, Magovern JA, Acuff TA, et al., Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery, Ann Thorac Surg, 1999;68:383–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  35. Kettering K, Dapunt O, Baer FM, Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review, J Cardiovasc Surg, 2004;45:255–64.
    PubMed
  36. Gummert JF, Funkat A, Krian A, Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2004: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg, 2005;53:391–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  37. de Canniere D, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Cichon R, et al., Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007;134:710–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  38. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, et al., Seven-year follow-up after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: experience with more than 1300 patients, Ann Thorac Surg, 2007;83:108–14.
    Crossref | PubMed
  39. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Walther T et al., Cumulative sum failure analysis for eight surgeons performing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007;134:663–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  40. Angelini GD, Wilde P, Salerno TA, et al., Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation, Lancet, 1996;347:757–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  41. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, et al., Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization, Ann Thorac Surg, 2008;86:1856–60.
    Crossref | PubMed
  42. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, et al., The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years, Ann Thorac Surg, 2004;78:2005–12.
    Crossref | PubMed
  43. Hayward PA, Gordon IR, Hare DL, et al., Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010;139:60–5.
    Crossref | PubMed
  44. Buxton BF, Hayward PA, Newcomb AE, et al., Choice of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: craft or science?, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009;35:658–70.
    Crossref | PubMed
  45. Sabik JF, Stockins A, Nowicki ER, et al., Does location of the second internal thoracic artery graft influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting?, Circulation, 2008;118:S210–5.
    Crossref | PubMed
  46. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al., Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART), Eur Heart J, 2010;31:2470–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  47. Saso S, James D, Vecht JA, et al., Effect of skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery for coronary revascularization on the incidence of sternal wound infection, Ann Thorac Surg, 2010;89:661–70.
    Crossref | PubMed
  48. Svensson LG, Mumtaz MA, Blackstone EH, et al., Does use of a right internal thoracic artery increase deep wound infection and risk after previous use of a left internal thoracic artery?, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2006;131:609–13.
    Crossref | PubMed
  49. Misfeld M, Potger K, Ross DE, et al., “Anaortic” off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting significantly reduces neurological complications compared to off-pump and conventional on-pump surgery with aortic manipulation, Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010;58:408–14.
    Crossref | PubMed
  50. Hilker M, Arlt M, Keyser A, et al., Minimizing the risk of perioperative stroke by clampless off-pump bypass surgery: a retrospective observational analysis, J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010;5:14.
    Crossref | PubMed
  51. Chiu KM, Chen CL, Chu SH, Lin TY, Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases, Surg Endosc, 2008;22:183–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  52. Cheng D, Allen K, Cohn W, et al., Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and controlled trials, Innovations, 2005;1:61–74.
    Crossref | PubMed
  53. Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, et al., Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery, N Engl J Med, 2009;361:235–44.
    Crossref | PubMed
  54. Ouzounian M, Hassan A, Buth KJ, et al., Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, Ann Thorac Surg, 2010;89:403–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  55. Crouch JD, O’Hair DP, Keuler JP, et al., Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: wound complications and vein quality, Ann Thorac Surg, 1999;68:1513–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  56. Patel AN, Henry AC, Hunnicutt C, et al., Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique, Ann Thorac Surg, 2004;78:149–53.
    Crossref | PubMed
  57. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Minimally invasive conduit harvesting: a systematic review, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006;29:324–33.
    Crossref | PubMed
  58. Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, et al., Patency rates of endoscopically harvested radial arteries one year after coronary artery bypass grafting, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007;134:649–56.
    Crossref | PubMed
  59. Cheng DC, Wall C, Djaiani G, et al., Randomized assessment of resource use in fast-track cardiac surgery 1-year after hospital discharge, Anesthesiology, 2003;98:651–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  60. Ender J, Borger MA, Scholz M, et al., Cardiac surgery fast-track treatment in a postanesthetic care unit: six-month results of the Leipzig fast-track concept, Anesthesiology, 2008;109:61–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  61. Bach J, Kammerer I, Isgro F, et al., The impact of intravenous aspirin administration on platelet aspirin resistance after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, Platelets, 2009;20:150–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  62. Gao G, Zheng Z, Pi Y, et al., Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy increases early venous graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery a single-center, randomized, controlled trial, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010;56:1639–43.
    Crossref | PubMed