Fetal and neonatal arrhythmias are diverse in type and severity. They include both tachycardias and bradycardias.1 The innate physiological properties of the fetal and neonatal myocardiums make them more vulnerable to these high or low ventricular rates. Irregularities of fetal and neonatal cardiac rhythm commonly occur, and rarely have serious consequences; however, it is important to realize that sustained tachycardias and bradycardias can lead to heart failure and hydrops fetalis.2,3
Fetal arrhythmias are noted in only 1% of all pregnancies and can be categorized by rate and regularity. Almost all arrhythmias fall into one of three categories: irregular, tachycardic, or bradycardic.4 Normal fetal heart rates range from 120 to 160bpm at 30 weeks of gestation, and from 110 to 150bpm at term.5,6 Heart rates below 100bpm are classified as bradycardia, and rates greater than 180bpm as tachycardia.1,7
Fetal arrhythmias are often first noted on auscultation during routine maternal pre-natal examinations once heart tones are appreciated, at around 10th weeks. Generally, the mother is asymptomatic and does not notice any decreased fetal activity.1,4 If a fetal tachycardia is heard, the referring practitioner should attempt to determine its rate and characteristics. Gradual onset and cessation are associated with normal fetal accelerations, especially with a rate below 200bpm. Abrupt changes, especially if the rate is over 200bpm, are more often associated with pathological tachycardias.8 Transient slowing of the fetal heart rate with immediate return to normal rates is common mid-trimester when patients lie supine, caused by normal variable-type fetal heart rate decelerations, and does not need further cardiac evaluation. This isolated physiological slowing of the heart must be differentiated from persistent bradycardia, which requires expedited evaluation.8,9
Approximately 50% of fetuses referred for evaluation of fetal arrhythmias are in normal sinus rhythm, with the vast majority having isolated supraventricular systoles. Fewer than 10% of fetuses are found to have sustained tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias.2
Once an arrhythmia is detected by auscultation, an additional evaluation is indicated. Currently, external acquisition of fetal electrocardiography is not available.8 Other non-invasive approaches include 2D fetal echocardiography, to exclude structural cardiac defects, and M-mode ultrasonography, which depicts cardiac motion as a function of time. A cursor placed through both the fetal atrium and ventricle allows the timing of atrial and ventricular contractions to be determined and premature beats to be identified.8,10,11 Similarly, pulsed Doppler can be used to identify fetal rhythms by assessing intracardiac flow patterns.10,12 Fetal magnetocardiography uses the magnetic field generated by electrical activity of the fetal heart for a more precise delineation of fetal rhythms.13,14
Fetal tachycardias may have several causes. It is important to exclude fetal distress (with loss of beat-to-beat variability) and chorioamnionitis (with maternal fever), which may cause fetal heart rates of up to 200bpm.8 The three most common fetal tachyarrhythmias, aside from premature atrial contractions (PACs), are supraventricular (re-entrant) tachycardia (SVT), atrial flutter (AF), and ventricular tachycardia (VT). PACs are fetal extra-systoles, and are associated with good outcomes.8 In 0.4% of cases, PACs may progress to fetal tachycardia. Therefore, it is recommended that these patients be monitored weekly to exclude the development of tachyarrhythmias.8,15
AF accounts for approximately 21% of fetal tachycardia, and may be associated with structural abnormalities. Fetal hydrops is associated with 7% of AF cases.16,17 AF is defined as an atrial rate ranging from 250 to 500bpm with either fixed or variable atrioventricular (AV) block,18and diagnosis can be confirmed by fetal echocardiography, which documents the atrium beating at a faster rate than the ventricle.1 Medical management in cases without hydrops may consist simply of digoxin therapy, whereas in other cases adding a second agent such as flecainide, procainamide, or amiodarone may be needed.8 Drug therapy is successful in 82% of patients. Hydropic fetuses may require more medication and a longer treatment period to control the condition.19
SVT is reported to account for 47% of cases of fetal tachycardia,18,19and only 2% of cases are associated with structural abnormalities.18 The most common SVT is an AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) that involves an accessory bypass tract between the atrium and the ventricle.1SVT may be either incessant or paroxysmal in nature, and may have ventricular rates varying from 250 to 300bpm, and is associated with fetal hydrops in 36¼% of cases.16,20 Medical management encompasses digoxin as the first-line treatment. This has been maternally administered, both orally and intravenously, or administered directly to the fetus intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, intra-amniotically, and intravenously.21 Placental transfer is excellent but diminished in the hydropic fetus. In about 40% of cases, a second agent may still be needed,8 such as amiodarone, flecainide, or sotalol, leading to increased efficacy of treatment and a reduction in fetal mortality.2,8,22
VT in the pre-natal situation is rare and can be difficult to diagnose. The fetal heart rate is often relatively normal (180 200bpm) and is usually well tolerated.8 The treatment of fetal VT includes propranolol, procainamide, and phenytoin. Lidocaine can also be used effectively for fetal VT.1 Digoxin should be avoided due to its potential to exacerbate VT.
The most significant fetal bradycardia is congenital complete heart block (CHB). Approximately 50% of fetuses with bradycardia are associated with mothers with connective tissue disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus8,23 and Sjogren¼™s syndrome with transplacental passage of two specific antibodies (anti-Ro and anti-La), which cause damage to the conduction system.2,8 The other 50% of fetuses with complete heart block have underlying congenital cardiac defects, including atrial isomerism, ventricular inversion, and heterotaxy syndromes.4,8 Diagnosis is made by echocardiography with a normal atrial rate and slower ventricular rate and AV dissociation.1 Most fetal heart rates are 45bpm. The prognosis depends on the presence or absence of structural heart disease, and the development of hydrops secondary to the very slow rate.1,3 High-dose maternal steroids have been used with limited success in patients whose mothers have connective tissue disease.24 This is thought to treat the associated myocarditis and occasionally improve the degree of AV block.25 Sympathomimetic drugs (such as terbutaline, isoproterenol, ritodrine, and salbutamol) administered maternally have demonstrated increases in heart rate with variable improvement in hydrops.26 All patients with known fetal CHB should be delivered in a tertiary care center with the means to provide emergency pacing techniques.1
Neonatal arrhythmias are similar to those seen in the fetus.1 Arrhythmias are found in 1% of newborns during the first 10 days of life. Most are premature supraventricular beats that will disappear during the first month of life.27 Neonatal tachyarrhythmias can be broadly classified into SVTs and ventricular tachycardias (VTs). The most commonly presenting pathological tachycardia in the newborn is narrow complex SVT.1,27
The clinical presentation of neonatal arrhythmias is variable. The development of symptoms depends on both the rate and duration of the arrhythmia. Some neonates do not become symptomatic, while others may develop signs of congestive heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Heart rates with neonatal tachyarrhythmias are usually in the range of 240 - 300bpm, while bradyarrhythmia rates are usually <100bpm.
PACs represent the most common arrhythmia of the neonatal period, and may be conducted either normally or aberrantly, or be completely blocked. Enough blocked PACs may actually result in bradycardia. Generally, PACs are considered to be benign when found in the structurally normal heart.27
AF is common in both the fetal and newborn period, and is caused by re-entry within the atrium.3 AF can be well tolerated if there is a high degree of AV block with a near normal ventricular rate.28 In the neonatal period, the atrial rate is usually 400bpm with 2:1 AV conduction. Sinus rhythm can be restored with intravenous digoxin or amiodraone via transesophageal pacing, or with direct current cardioversion. Digoxin is sometimes used for long-term medical therapy, although it is seldom needed.3,27 In structurally normal hearts, recurrence is rare.
Atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET) is usually caused by an automatic focus in the left or right atrium. It is manifested on electrocardiogram (ECG) as a narrow complex tachycardia with an abnormal P wave preceding the QRS complex. AET can present as a sustained arrhythmia that is often resistant to medical management. Digoxin and class IA antiarrhythmic medications alone are rarely effective. Some improvement has been seen with beta blockers, class IC antiarrhythmic drugs, and class III drugs. Frequent resolution of AET often presents in neonates.3,28,29,30
AVRT is the most common mechanism of SVT in the neonatal period, accounting for almost 50% of all patients who have SVT.3,27 The arrhythmia circuit involves the AV node and an accessory connection. The termination of tachycardia is easily achieved by the intravenous administration of adenosine.3 AVRT can also be terminated by vagal maneuvers, such as ice over the face, gagging, or use of a rectal probe. Esophageal overdrive pacing has been shown to be beneficial in neonates.27 Chronic therapy with digoxin (non-Wolff-Parkinson-White) or beta blockers is first-line treatment to prevent the recurrence of AVRT. Class IA, IC, and III antiarrhythmic medications can be used if first-line agents fail.3,27 Patients without recurrence are weaned off therapy by six to 12 months of age.3It is important to note that potent negative inotropic agents, although safe and effective in older children and adults, should be used with extreme caution in infants below one year of age, since they can worsen already compromised ventricular function.1,3 Owing to reported neonatal deaths in babies with SVT treated with intravenous verapamil, this drug is no longer recommended in treating neonatal tachycardias.31
Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia is a type of AVRT that can be incessant at a relatively slow rate of approximately 200bpm. Treatment is difficult since the response to adenosine or electrical cardioversion is usually transient. Long-term treatment with a beta blocker, amiodarone, or flecainide is usually needed, with definitive treatment being radiofrequency ablation later in childhood.3,29
VT is much less common than SVT in neonates.1,27,29 It may occur either in the structurally normal heart or in the setting of congenital heart disease. The most common form of neonatal VT is an automatic mechanism arising from the right ventricular outflow tract.1 Several etiologies of VT must be considered, including myocarditits, rare cardiac tumors (hamartomas and rhabdomyomas), VT after myocardial infarction, electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities, drug toxicity, and cardiac channelopathies such as long QT and Brugada syndromes.18,27 Patients who are hemodynamically compromised should undergo immediate synchronized cardioversion or defibrillation. Neonates who have structurally normal hearts usually experience a spontaneous resolution of ventricular arrhythmias. Therapy should be reserved for incessant or sustained VT, or for rapidly conducting, non-sustained VT. Chronic therapy is based on the underlying etiology of the arrhythmia with the use of beta blockers and class IA, IB, IC, and III antiarrhythmic drugs. Digoxin and adenosine are generally not helpful in treating VT.1,27
In neonates the most common cause of sustained bradycardia is congenital CHB. This may be associated with structural congenital heart defects, with the most common being ventricular inversion and defects of the AV septum.1 CHB in structurally normal hearts can occur in infants born to mothers with connective tissue disorders such as SLE or Sjogren™s syndrome, thought to be due to anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies crossing the placenta and attacking the myocardium and the conduction system.1,23,27 Symptomatic newborns with a wide complex escape rhythm or ventricular rates <50bpm should have a permanent pacemaker placed.1,27
Neonatal first-degree heart block is usually seen with disorders of the AV node, and is commonly associated with congenital heart disease or inflammatory disorders of the myocardium. Most patients are asymptomatic and need no further therapy.27 Second-degree heart block is generally related to medications or maternal connective tissue disease. The placement of a permanent pacemaker may be necessary.27
The mechanisms of fetal and neonatal arrhythmias are similar and include a wide range of possible diagnoses. The natural history and prevalence of these arrhythmias are in striking contrast to those seen in older children and adults, meaning that it is increasingly important for the physician to be aware of the etiology, development, and natural history of these arrhythmias, and the diagnostic and therapeutic options available.
- Tanel RE, RhodesLA,“Fetal and neonatal arrhythmias”, Clin Perinatol (2001);28(1): pp. 187-207, vii.
- Kleinman CS, Neghme RA,RA,“Cardiac arrhythmias in the human fetus”, Pediatr Cardiol (2004);25(3): pp. 234-251.
- Wren C,C,“Cardiac arrhythmias in the fetus and newborn”, Semin Fetal Neonatal Med (2006);11(3): pp. 182-190.
- Cullen T,“Evaluation of fetal arrhythmias”, Am Fam Physician (1992);46(6): pp. 1745-1749.
- Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R,"Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring", Int J Gynecol Obstet (1987);25: p. 159.
- Nijhuis IJM, ten Hof J, Mulder EJH, et al., “Antenatal fetal heart rate monitoring; normograms and minimal duration of recordings”, Prenat Neonat Med (1998);3: pp. 314-322.
- Kleinman CS, Neghme R, Copel JA, et al.,al.,“Fetal cardiac arrhythmias: diagnosis and therapy”, in Creasy RK, Resnik R (eds), Matern-fetal Medicine (1998), Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, pp. 301-318.
- Copel JA, Friedman AH, Kleinman CS, “Management of fetal cardiac arrhythmias”, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am (1997);24(1): pp. 201-211.
- Mendoza GJ,Almeida O, Steinfeld L, "Intermittent fetal bradycardia induced by midpregnancy fetal ultrasonographic study”,Am J Obstet Gynecol (1989);160: pp. 1038-1040.
- Cameron A, Nicholson S, Nimrod C, et al.,“Evaluation of fetal cardiac dysrhythmias with two-dimensional, M-mode, and pulsed Doppler ultrasonography”, Am J Obstet Gynecol (1988);158: pp. 286-290.
- Silverman NH, Enderlein MA, Stanger P, et al., “Recognition of fetal arrhythmias by echocardiography”, J Clin Ultrasound (1985);13(4): pp. 255-263.
- Kleinman CS, Copel JA, Hobbins JC, “Combined echocardiographic and Doppler assessment of fetal congenital atrioventricular block”, Br J Obstet Gynaecol (1987);94(10): pp. 967-974.
- Quartero HW, Stinstra JG, Golbach EG, Meijboom EJ, Peters MJ, “Clinical implications of fetal magnetocardiography”, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol (2002);20(2): pp. 142-153.
- Grimm B, Haueisen J, Huotilainen M, et al., “Recommended standards for fetal magnetocardiography”, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol (2003);26(11): pp. 2121-2126.
- Strasburger JF, "Fetal arrhythmias”, Prog Pediatr Cardiol (2000);11(1): pp. 1-17.
- Kleinman CS, Copel JA,Weinstein EM, Santulli TV Jr, Hobbins JC, “Treatment of fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias”, J Clin Ultrasound (1985);13(4): pp. 265-273.
- Jaeggi E, Fouron JC, Drblik SP, “Fetal atrial flutter: diagnosis, clinical features, treatment, and outcome”, J Pediatr (1998);132(2): pp. 335-359.
- Oudijk MA, Visser GH, Meijboom EJ, “Fetal tachyarrhythmia – part I: diagnosis”, Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J (2004;)4(3): pp. 104-113.
- Van Engelen AD,Weijtens O, Brenner JI, et al.,al.,“Management, outcome, and follow-up of fetal tachycardia”, J Am Coll Cardiol (1994);24(5): pp. 1371-1375.
- Simpson JM, Sharland GK, "Fetal tachycardias: management and outcome of 127 consecutive cases”, Heart (1998);79(6): pp. 576-581.
- Hallak M, Neerhof MG, Perry R, et al., “Fetal supraventricular tachycardia and hydrops fetalis: combined intensive, direct, and transplacental therapy”, Obstet Gynecol (1991);78: pp. 523-525.
- Frohn-Mulder IM, Stewart PA, Witsenburg M, et al., “The efficacy of flecainide versus digoxin in the management of fetal supraventricular tachycardia”, Prenat Diagn (1995);15(13): pp. 1297-1302.
- Taylor PV, Scott JS, Gerlis LM, Esscher E, Scott O, “Maternal antibodies against fetal cardiac antigens in congenital complete heart block”, N Engl J Med (1986);315(11): pp. 667-672.
- Copel JA, Buyon JP, Kleinman CS, “Successful in utero therapy of fetal heart block”, Am J Obstet Gynecol (1995);173(5): pp. 1384-1390.
- Silverman ED, “Congenital heart block and neonatal lupus erythematosus: Prevention is the goal”, J Rheumatol (1993);20: pp. 1101-1104.
- Groves AMM,Allan LD, Rosenthal E,“Therapeutic trial of sympathomimetics in three cases of complete heart block in the fetus”, Circulation (1995);92: pp. 3394-3396.
- Dubin AM,“Arrhythmias in the newborn”, Neoreviews (2000);1: pp. 146-151.
- Kothari DS, Skinner JR,“Neonatal tachycardias: an update”,, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed (2006);91(2): F136-144.
- Salerno JC, Kertesz NJ, Friedman RA, Fenrich AL Jr, “Clinical course of atrial ectopic tachycardia is age-dependent: results and treatment in children <3 or >3 years of age”, J Am Coll Cardiol (2004);43(3): pp. 438-444.
- Bauersfeld U, Gow RM, Hamilton RM, Izukawa T, “Treatment of atrial ectopic tachycardia in infants <6 months old”, Am Heart J (1995);129(6): pp. 1145-1148.
- Epstein ML, Kiel EA, Victorica BE, “Cardiac decompensation following verapamil therapy in infants with supraventricular tachycardia", Pediatrics (1985);75(4): pp. 737-740.